Ceuta from the Isabel II lookout point. Photograph by Ongayo, uploaded in July 2008; date taken not specified. Public domain. Archive and original file. Display cropping adjusted; this is not a 2026 image.
Geography changes the picture.
At the scale of the Mediterranean, two points. At the scale of the cities, neighbourhoods, roads, ports and border posts.
The detailed maps below use OpenStreetMap data. You can switch cities, zoom in and hide roads. Local political boundaries are not shown.
An African shore, Spanish cities.
Ceuta lies at the eastern entrance to the Strait of Gibraltar. Melilla is farther east, on the Alboran Sea. Madrid regards them as integral parts of Spain; Rabat claims them.
This regional map locates the cities. It does not show their administrative boundaries.
Ceuta is not just Tarajal.
The city stretches between its seafronts. Its port links the African shore to the peninsula. Benzú and Tarajal occupy two distinct coastal sectors of the border system.
On the OpenStreetMap base, the fine lines show only a selection of the main roads.
At the end of the breakwater, the sea.
At Tarajal, the control line reaches the shoreline. Swimming around a breakwater is not the same as crossing a land checkpoint.
The zoom shows the site, not people’s routes. The diagram in the next section explains types of crossing without claiming to reconstruct a real trajectory.
Melilla: another border story.
On 24 June 2022, between 1,300 and 2,000 people tried to cross the Melilla perimeter. Morocco announced 23 deaths; UN experts put the number at at least 37, according to Human Rights Watch.
The map follows the four passages of the narrative. The buttons also allow free exploration.
Two days of crossings. Weeks of consequences.
On 30 and 31 July 2026, tens of thousands of people arrived in Ceuta. Estimates vary depending on the date of the count and its scope. Returns began while the humanitarian emergency continued.
A warning before the tipping point.
The documents made public on 9 September include an urgent CNI note sent to the Moroccan authorities on 29 July. It refers to online calls to cross the border.
The moving lines indicate a direction of crossing; they do not measure people’s speed, number or route. Benzú is outside the frame.
≈ 72 000
entries over the two days, according to the count reported by Associated Press on 9 September. A dated order of magnitude, not a live counter. AP.
≈ 63 000
returns to Morocco in 72 hours, according to the Spanish government. This figure is not enough to establish the conditions of each return. La Moncloa, 3 September.
Why do the first figures differ?
On 1 August, the Interior Ministry put entries on 30 July at between 50,000 and 60,000. Estimates published later cover a different point in time and, sometimes, both days. Setting them side by side without their dates creates a false impression of precision. Original source.
First surveillance documents on crossings by swimming.
A CNI situation note describes migratory pressure.
Two numbers circulated at different stages. They overlap; they do not add up.
96
Figure from the authorities in Ceuta and Morocco’s CNDH reported by AP before the 3 September appearance.
141
Figure put forward by organisations, then cited by Pedro Sánchez in Parliament on 3 September.
Repeating a death toll in an official speech does not replace the work of identification. Missing persons and deaths are different categories; families are still seeking answers.
These archives do not show the events of 2026. They make it possible to look at the places before returning to the crises that made them visible.
Tarajal · the checkpoint and the shorelineArchive from before February 2014; exact date not given. La Marea, CC BY-SA 3.0. Source. Image unchanged.Melilla · a fence in the landscapeAugust 2008. Ongayo, CC BY-SA 4.0. Source. Image unchanged.
A border that was also crossed to work.
In Melilla, women carry heavy bundles on their backs. This 2018 documentary shows an everyday dimension of the border space: work and exchanges with neighbouring Morocco.
The archive offers a counterpoint to crisis imagery. On its own, it does not tell us about the current state of this activity.
The Cargo Women of Melilla, Gosia Juszczak / Novara Media, with Caravana Abriendo Fronteras. Published on 4 February 2018. Extract 01:06–01:18, reduced resolution, compressed and sound removed; CC BY 3.0. Source and full film.
Embedded playback requires JavaScript. The original film is available via the links above.
The crisis has a date. The border, a history.
Eight markers linking Spain’s presence, European control and episodes of violence. The intervals on this timeline are not proportional to elapsed time.
1497
Melilla comes under Castilian control.
The capture of Melilla opens several centuries of Spanish presence on this part of the North African coast.
1580. Ceuta, Portuguese since 1415, comes under the Iberian monarchy; it remains Spanish after 1640.
1995. Schengen comes into force in Spain, with a special regime for the two cities.
2005. Deadly crossings are followed by reinforced fencing.
2014. At least fourteen people drown at Tarajal on 6 February.
2021. About nine thousand entries into Ceuta in two days, in the context of a diplomatic crisis.
2022. Melilla tragedy on 24 June: 23 dead according to Morocco, at least 37 according to UN experts cited by HRW.
2026. Mass crossings in Ceuta on 30 and 31 July; a pneumatic barrier is then installed at Tarajal.
Entry is not free movement.
In Ceuta and Melilla, Schengen applies under a specific regime. Passage to mainland Spain is subject to another check. Arrival therefore settles neither the right to stay nor the next stage of the journey.
The crossing
Land checkpoint, fence or seaward end: the material conditions of entry differ.
The individual procedure
Identification, vulnerability, a possible asylum claim and a decision on stay or return are separate questions.
Departure for the peninsula
At the port or the airport, control of movement does not disappear simply because the person is already in a Spanish city.
UNICEF Spain calls for an individual assessment and the guarantees provided by law before any reunification, return or transfer. The best interests of the child cannot be replaced by a collective decision. Read its 12 August position.
When the flow stops, the emergency remains.
After the crossings and the returns, public action shifts: accommodation, healthcare, child protection, identification and individual procedures.
On 25 August, Madrid declared a situation of interest for national security in Ceuta, until 31 December. This mechanism coordinates state resources; it does not suspend fundamental rights. Read the BOE.
€309m
Package announced by Madrid on 1 September for services, security, reception and the local economy. Source.
≈ 1 100
Unaccompanied minors estimated by the local government and reported by the EPRS in September, including young people who arrived before the influx. This is not the total number of minors who entered in July.
40
Documents published on 9 September to trace the warnings. A documentary record alone does not settle the question of responsibility.
A map shows the places. It does not determine responsibility.
To understand Ceuta and Melilla, geography, narratives, dates and rights must be held together — without conflating the two cities, the episodes of crisis or the counting methods.
Editorial scope: information available as of 14 September 2026. OpenStreetMap base layers extracted on 15 September. Neither live feed, predictive simulation nor crossing route.